Discovering ESL Teachers’ Grading Practices Alignment with the Policy Mandates in the Implementation of Classroom Based Assessment in Malaysian Schools.

Anwar Farhan Mohamad Marzaini

Abstract


Effective assessment practices play a pivotal role in supporting student learning, particularly within the framework of Classroom-Based Assessment (CBA). This study examines how English as a Second Language (ESL) teachers in Malaysia apply grading practices in formative assessment within classroom-based assessments (CBA) and their alignment with policy mandates. Employing a qualitative phenomenological design, data were gathered through semi-structured interviews and analysis of curriculum documents from the CBA Guidebook. Six Form 2 ESL teachers from three public secondary schools in Pulau Pinang have participated in the study. Thematic analysis revealed commendable grading practices, with teachers employing various strategies. However, a misalignment was noted between these practices and policy directives, as teachers tended to adopt exam-oriented approaches. The study has implications for ESL education in Malaysia, highlighting the need for better alignment between policy and practice and providing practical recommendations to align grading methods with educational objectives. The study contributes to a deeper understanding of CBA in ESL contexts, fostering better alignment between teaching practices and policy goals to enhance the effectiveness of formative assessments in Malaysian ESL classrooms.


Keywords


Classroom Based Assessment; Formative Assessment; Grading Practices; ESL Teachers

References


A. Akbari and M. Shahrokhi, “Unveiling fairness in scoring: a thorough method for precise cutoff score calculation in education assessment,” Quality Assurance in Education, vol. 32, no. 3, Jun. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-12-2023-0208.

A. Darabi Bazvand and A. Rasooli, “Students’ experiences of fairness in summative assessment: A study in a higher education context,” Studies in Educational Evaluation, vol. 72, p. 101118, Mar. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101118.

A. M. Sari, Ambiyar, and I. Aziz, “Computer Based Technology And Classroom Assesment,” International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS), vol. 1, no. 3, Dec. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v1i3.54.

A. F. Mohamad Marzaini, “Legitimate peripheral participation of teachers in the implementation of CEFR-aligned classroom based assessment in Malaysian secondary schools,” Phd Thesis, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 2025. Available: https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/111698/

A. Jönsson, A. Balan, and E. Hartell, “Analytic or holistic? A study about how to increase the agreement in teachers’ grading,” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 1–16, Feb. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2021.1884041.

Curriculum Development Division., Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran. Bahasa Inggeris Tingkatan Dua. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia., 2017.

D. O. Braithwaite and P. Schrodt, Engaging theories in interpersonal communication : multiple perspectives. New York, Ny: Routledge, 2022.

F. I. Marnizam and S. R. Ali, “Evaluation of The Implementation of Classroom Assessment (PBD) Among Primary School Mathematics Teachers,” Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 81, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol11.2.7.2021.

F. Mohamad Marzaini , S. Mat Yusoff, N. Zakaria, H. Basal, W. N. E. Haslee Sharil , and K. Supramaniam, “A Discovery On Malaysian Esl Teachers’ Adherence To Policy Mandates In Classroom Based Assessment Practices,” Malaysian journal of learning & instruction, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 249–284, Jan. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2024.21.1.9.

H. Chin, L. M. Thien, and C. M. Chiew, “The Reforms Of National Assessments In Malaysian Education System,” Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), vol. 4, no. 1, p. 93, Jun. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol4iss1pp93-111.

H. H. M. Khory, M. N. A. Rahman, and M. A. Zailaini, “Pengurusan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Arab Berasaskan Keperluan Pembelajaran Murid,” JuPiDi: Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 41–57, May 2021, Available: https://ejournal.um.edu.my/index.php/JUPIDI/article/view/29946

H. Hajmi and K. Jamaludin, “Kesediaan Guru Dalam Pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah Di Sekolah Rendah,” Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 119–125, 2022, Available: https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/jdpd/article/view/20751

J. Pilarska, “The Constructivist Paradigm and Phenomenological Qualitative Research Design,” Research Paradigm Considerations for Emerging Scholars, vol. 1, pp. 64–83, Dec. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781845418281-008.

J. W. Creswell and J. C. Báez, 30 Essential Skills for the Qualitative Researcher. SAGE Publications, 2020.

K. M. A. Salviejo, E. D. Ibañez, and J. T. Pentang, “Critical thinking disposition and learning approach as predictors of mathematics performance,” Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1107–1116, Nov. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i4.21386.

K. S. Arumugham, “Kurikulum, pengajaran dan pentaksiran dari perspektif pelaksanaan pentaksiran bilik darjah,” Asian People Journal (APJ), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 152–161, Apr. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.37231/apj.2020.3.1.175.

L. B. Nilson, Specifications Grading. Routledge, 2023.

M. Ahmad and S. Wilkins, “Purposive sampling in qualitative research: a framework for the entire journey,” Quality & Quantity, vol. 59, Dec. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5.

M. C. Alkin, A. T. Vo, and C. A. Christie, Evaluation Essentials. Guilford Publications, 2024.

M. Isa, A. Ghani, and A.-A. Mydin, “School-Based Management (SBM) Practices in Malaysia: A Systematic Literature Review,” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 822–838, Sep. 2020, Accessed: May 27, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v10-i9/7870

M. Maguire, S. Gewirtz, E. Towers, and E. Neumann, “Contextualising policy work: policy enactment and the specificities of English secondary schools,” Research Papers in Education, vol. 35, pp. 1–22, Apr. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1601758.

Ministry of Education , Panduan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah (2nd ed.). Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum . , 2019.

O. Ketsman and T. Reeves, “K-12 Teachers’ Implementation of Standards-Based Grading in the Classroom: A Quantitative Study,” Journal of school administration research and development, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 65–75, Oct. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.32674/jsard.v8i2.5565.

R. Abd Razak, S. Mat Yusoff, C. Hai Leng, and A. F. Mohamad Marzaini, “Evaluating teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in implementing classroom-based assessment: A case study among esl secondary school teachers in Selangor, Malaysia,” PLOS ONE, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. e0293325–e0293325, Dec. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293325.

S. Thirakunkovit, “Establishing a fair cut score for an in-house English test: a case study on integrating two standard- setting methods,” Language Testing in Asia, vol. 15, no. 1, Mar. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-025-00348-x.

V. Braun and V. Clarke, Thematic Analysis: a Practical Guide. London: SAGE, 2022.

V. W. Primus and M. Mosin, “Strategi Pengurusan Evidens Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah Murid Berkeperluan Khas dalam Program Inklusif Sekolah Rendah,” Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 282–293, Sep. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i9.1026.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v20i3.23971

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Intelektual Pustaka Media Utama

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn)
p-ISSN: 2089-9823; e-ISSN: 2302-9277
Published by Intelektual Pustaka Media Utama (IPMU) in collaboration with the Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science (IAES).

View EduLearn Stats