Constructivist Learning Paradigm as the Basis on Learning Model Development

Kurniawan Yudhi Nugroho


Research on the knowledge quality development has advanced very rapidly in these recent years. Yet, researchers have conducted their studies mostly in a specific issue within the frame of classroom teaching. This paper aims at presenting the conceptual design of academic knowledge development based on the theories of constructivist learning. These theories suggest that learning process should have been able to provide students with opportunities to get involved in an active process to make sense of new experience by connecting ideas with the basic knowledge they have. In addition, this conceptual design is made as an endeavor to discuss how the theories of constructivist learning may impact to the students’ knowledge quality enhancement. This paper would also discuss about how the concept of constructivist learning impacts to learners’ academic learning environment, learning participation and learning responsibility.




Constructivist Learning Theories, Students’ Academic Learning Environment, Students’ Learning Participation, Students’ Learning Responsibility

Full Text:



Ahston-Hay, S. (2006). Constructivism and Powerful Learning Environments. 9th International English Language Teaching Convention “The Fusion of Theory and Practice”222. Retrieved from

Akar, H. (2003). Impact of Constructivist Learning Process on Preservice Teacher Education Students’ Performance, Retention and Attitudes, (December), 1–286. Retrieved from

Cornu, R. Le, Peters, J., & Collins, J. (2003). What Are The Characteristics of Constructivist Learning Cultures ?, 44(0).

Dougiamas, M. (1998). A journey into constructivism. Retrieved August 13, 2001, from

Dunlop, J.C., & Grabinger, R.S. (1996). Rich environments for the active learning in higher education. In G. B. Wilson (Ed.), Constructing learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 65-82). Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications.

Ferhat, Y. (2016). An Institutional Perspective into Professional Development of English Teachers : A Case of Schools of Foreign Languages, 232(April), 828–832.

Jones, M. G., & Brader-Araje, L. (2002). The Impact of Constructivism in Education, Discourse and Maeaning. American Communication Journal, 5(3), 1–10. Retrieved from

Jordan, C. (2013). Comparison of International Baccalaureate (IB) chemistry students’ preferred vs actual experience with a constructivist style of learning in a Moodle e‐learning environment. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 2(2), 155–167.

Kelly, G. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs: Volumes one and two. Norton. New York, NY.

Kelly, G. (1963), A Theory of Personality, Norton, New York, NY.

Larson, B. E. (2000). Classroom discussion: A method of instruction and a curriculum outcome. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 661-677.

Marlowe, A. B., & Page, L. M. (1998). Creating and sustaining the constructivist classroom. California: Corwin Press.

Mingazova. (2014). Modification Of The Active Learning Methods In Environmental Education In Russian Universities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 131, 85–89.

Mitchell, H., & Myles, F. (1988). Second language learning theories. London: Arnold.

Nugroho, K. Y. (2013). The Applicability of Small Group Discussion in English Reading Class. Semarang, Indonesia: State University of Semarang.

Perkins, D. 2006. Constructivism and troublesome knowledge. In overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge, ed. J.H.F. Meyer and R. Land, 33–46. Abingdon: Routledge.

Piaget, J. (1932), Moral Judgment of the Child, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co., London.

Porcaro, D. (2011). Applying constructivism in instructivist learning cultures. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, 5(1), 39–54.

Reinders, H. (2010). Towards a Classroom Pedagogy for Learner Autonomy : A Framework of Independent Language Learning Skills, 35(5).

Skerritt, O. Z, & Roche, V. (2014). Quality Assurance in Education A constructivist model for evaluating postgraduate supervision : a case study A constructivist model for evaluating postgraduate supervision : a case study.

Tam, M. (1999). Constructivism : Implications for Teaching and Learning. Journal of Education, (November).

Weller, M. (2002), Delivering Learning on the Net, Kogan Page, London.

Zuber‐Skerritt, O., & Roche, V. (2004). A constructivist model for evaluating postgraduate supervision: a case study. Quality Assurance in Education, 12(2), 82–93.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 Intelektual Pustaka Media Utama

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn)
ISSN: 2089-9823, e-ISSN 2302-9277
Published by Intelektual Pustaka Media Utama (IPMU) in collaboration with the Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science (IAES).

View EduLearn Stats